Dash One wrote:Quote: "I know many that have offered information to you guys only to have it exploited on the air."
From my personal experience: Nothing I have ever told Robbo, Nelly or Rob, in confidence, has been repeated on-air. I have at times, given reports on the show and relayed non-classified info for general consumption. It is a fine line between giving up too much information, and sharing the same, in an effort to steer fellow anglers in the right direction so that we can all enjoy other's success. As far as the reports given on-air ... it wouldn't be much of a show without some when, where, and technique.
More and more, I find myself tight-lipped about a current hot bite. I spend a lot of time and $$ in pursuit of that bite. It is disheartening to me to get on fish, only to arrive at that spot a few days later and see 30 or 40 boats in that small area ... at times, the result of and internet report. I feel I have "earned it" so to speak, and believe others should as well ... and think part of the challenge and joy of salmon fishing is finding fish and the figuring out the right presentation. To put out too much detail deprives/denies others who are not willing to put in the time and effort to make their own report ... as some expect too much in the way of immediate success.
Keep up the good work ... but don't tell anyone I told you that!
Jay
Couldn't have said it any better Jay. As someone that loves to help a fellow recreational fisherman I'll say this.
There are places in WA both in the salt and the fresh that I share with friends only. Very little has to be said to any of mine whether they're a popular media person or in contrast a to-themself-type with no internet or computer when it comes to "spots" that are found and patterned by time spent. Some of the most proficient recreational fishermen I've had the pleasure to know that can type do so with their two index fingers if they even know how to type at all.
For someone to get bent out of shape that a popular well known "area" fishery gets in the spotlight on a blog, forum, or a radio broadcast is rediculous. Likewise, a true "spot" that's brought to attention publicly does erk me. Seen it done to small streams in the past via the WWW, and am seeing salt "spots" on the WWW as recently as last month. Even salt spots certainly can attract a mass of report chasers. Not that there isn't enough fish for everyone, but in certain "spots" there isn't enough room for boats and occasionally the pressure will kill a bite. It's not like giving an offshore tuna/salmon coordinate. Beauty of certain spot fisheries, their intracacies can deter to report chasers. But if they get a detailed enough good one, they're deterimined. A couple of years back we literally got run onto a washrock by an unfamiliar report chaser. I don' think they landed a fish in the spot that day, but they managed to cut off one of ours and while ignoring the rules of the road, caused us to hang our DR balls on said washrock shortly after.
"Hero" seems to be a term used to describe the loose lipped. They hold up every fish they catch for pics, share them publicly, and usually openly share the exact where/how/what. If someone has a problem with that so be it. As Ray mentioned it's part of current media. When it comes to "spots", it comes down to common sense. Keep it amongst your buddies after (or already) politely suggesting that public brodcasting of "spots" is a no-no, if it can't handle a crowd. There are even some that try to create a crowd to simply expand their "hero" status.
When Tobeck, Robbo, or Big Tom, or even one of my Neandrethal buddies with no Webz (big tom has webz and can type though) wants a detailed fishing report that happens to envole a "spot", they'll get it in as much detail as they want. And I'll know not one of them won't broadcast it on the Web or the Radio with minimal explaination. It was that way before the WWW and is that way now with many of us.