by Bear » Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:49 pm
I am curious as to what you guys specifically object to in the bill. Is it the scientific review of significant decisions made by the Department and Commission?
This is the Reader's Digest version:
"EFFECT: The amended bill creates a three-member biological science review process (process) to review significant decisions of the department of fish and wildlife and the fish and wildlife commission and, if appropriate, conduct a peer review of those decisions with the appropriate scientific community. The department of fish and wildlife (WDFW) is not required to create or annotate any information for the process, and the results of the process may not be used as the basis for a cause of action, as well as specifying that the third-party review must exclude additional department interactions.
Taxidermists, fur dealers, or wildlife meat cutters are allowed to record the license number of the person delivering product as an optional alternative to recording personal information.
The fish and wildlife commission is authorized to use their rule-making authority to clear up any ambiguity created by the statutory use of common names for species and classes of species.
The WDFW is directed to prepare a one-time report to the legislature that identifies potential programs, license fees, and mechanisms by which private, nonprofit salmon enhancement organizations would be enabled to raise and control funds that can be used for the salmon enhancement goals of the organizations.
Any person who loses or abandons net fishing gear is required to report the loss to the department of fish and wildlife; language is maintained encouraging the reporting of lost shellfish pots."
Just curious,
Bear